Reference feature
State whether the job is edge, centre or line guidance and identify the physical feature that the sensor must resolve.[2]
Resources / Ultrasonic vs Photoelectric Sensors
Sensor selection should begin with the actual material, guiding target and installation geometry. Rather than treating either sensing method as universal, compare what the sensor must detect, the available mounting position and the evidence from an on-machine trial.
Use the material, target, mounting geometry and trial evidence to make a reviewable sensor decision.
A web-guide sensor supplies position information to a controller so that the guide can correct lateral position. Define whether the required reference is an edge, centreline, printed line or another approved feature before choosing the sensing method.[2]
The FMS US01B/US04B ultrasonic sensor manual describes a transmitter-and-receiver sensor for web guiding. For those models, the manufacturer states that transparent films can be detected, while sound-permeable materials such as net-like or open-weave textiles are not suitable.[1]
That product manual also defines an 8 mm detection range and requires the web edge to be aligned through the sensor axis and the detection area. Those dimensions and alignment instructions are model-specific; verify them against the selected product and the real mounting geometry.[1]
Use ultrasonic sensing as a candidate when the intended material and the sensor's documented operating conditions match. A material sample and the actual path are still required to confirm the installed result.
The documented BKS015 guide system can use optical sensors as well as ultrasonic sensors, and uses sensor position feedback for edge or centre applications. The controller, guide frame and sensor arrangement must therefore be reviewed as one installed loop.[2]
For a photoelectric option, identify the feature the sensor will use and test it with the intended material, printed condition, illumination, mounting distance and operating speed. Do not promote a catalogue description into a compatibility guarantee for a different sensor model or process.
State whether the job is edge, centre or line guidance and identify the physical feature that the sensor must resolve.[2]
Check bracket position, sensor orientation, web path and clearance before relying on a selected sensor family.
Confirm the input, wiring and configuration rules from the controller and sensor documentation for the specific installation.[2]
A trial should compare the approved sensor candidates under the same material, web path and operating condition. Record the sensor position, reference feature, line speed, controller configuration and the observed result so that the decision can be reviewed later.
The cited ultrasonic-sensor manual states that its US01B/US04B models can detect transparent films, subject to the model's installation and operating conditions. Confirm the actual material and mounting arrangement with a trial before selection.
No universal conclusion should be made from the sensor category alone. Identify the feature to be detected and verify it on the actual material, printed condition, mounting geometry and selected product documentation.
The cited BKS015 documentation lists both optical and ultrasonic sensors for that system. Compatibility, wiring and configuration must be confirmed for the exact controller and sensor models in the installation.
Record the material, target feature, web path, sensor position, speed, controller configuration, observed result and the acceptance criteria. This keeps the selection decision reviewable and repeatable.
Send the material details, web width, target edge or mark, speed range, web-path drawing, sensor mounting photos, controller model and the operating condition to be tested. KRD can help scope an ultrasonic or photoelectric sensor trial.