Zone boundary
Identify the nipped or driven elements that isolate the unwind, process or rewind span. A controller cannot create a separate tension zone if the web path does not mechanically isolate it.
Resources / Choose a Tension Controller
Choose the control architecture before choosing the controller model. Define the machine zone, feedback method, actuator or drive command, sensing range, interfaces and acceptance conditions so the shortlist matches the real web path.
A usable specification connects the web zone, feedback architecture, actuator, signals and measurable commissioning targets.
Start by marking the controlled web span and the driven or resisting element that can change its tension. Siemens distinguishes a winder axis, where roll diameter changes, from a sectional tension-control axis without that changing-diameter dependency. That distinction affects the speed, torque and diameter information the controller may need.[1]
Identify the nipped or driven elements that isolate the unwind, process or rewind span. A controller cannot create a separate tension zone if the web path does not mechanically isolate it.
State whether the task is to hold measured web tension, hold dancer position, calculate an indirect torque command, or provide a manual output.[1][2]
Record what must be acceptable at startup, acceleration, steady speed, deceleration, splice or roll change instead of specifying only one normal running point.
The feedback architecture determines what the controller actually knows. An indirect or open-loop method does not use measured web tension as feedback. Load-cell control measures web tension directly, while dancer control normally regulates dancer position and relies on the dancer mechanics to establish the resulting tension.[1][2]
Use the machine model to calculate a command without direct tension feedback. On a centre-driven roll, diameter, gear ratio, friction and acceleration compensation can materially affect the result.[1][2]
Use a force-measurement device when the controller must compare actual web tension with a setpoint and correct the command from that measured value.[1][2]
Use position feedback when the machine includes a dancer assembly and the control task is to maintain its position. Travel, applied force and mechanical geometry remain part of the tension system.[1][2]
Do not treat automatic closed-loop control as a universal upgrade. The correct choice depends on whether the machine can supply useful feedback, whether its mechanics support that method, and whether the resulting complexity is justified by the acceptance criteria.[1][2]
A feedback sensor does not determine the complete control method. Rockwell documents distinct implementations for dancer position with speed trim, load-cell tension with speed trim, load-cell tension with torque trim, and open-loop torque. Its centre-winder application also requires a drive with torque-control capability when that architecture is selected.[2]
Load-cell selection is not based on target web tension alone. Maxcess's GTS manual sizes its specific load cells from maximum tension, sensing-roll weight and web-path angles, then requires a rating above the calculated load. The exact equation is product-specific, but the example shows why the real mounting geometry must be included in the sensor specification.[3]
Use the following as a KRD engineering scoping worksheet. It organizes the inputs needed to compare controller families, but it does not replace machine drawings, safety review, sensor sizing or on-machine commissioning.
Specify the controller together with the sensor, actuator, drive mode and mechanical web path so the interfaces are designed as one system.
Verify what the existing drive or brake can accept, where feedback can be installed, and which present problems are mechanical rather than controller-related.
Record every old terminal and signal function before selecting a replacement. Matching the supply voltage or panel cut-out alone is not sufficient.
After the worksheet is complete, compare KRD automatic, semi-automatic and manual controller families against the required feedback and output method. Use individual product pages to confirm model-specific inputs, outputs and supported actuators; the article is a selection workflow, not a substitute for the current product specification.
Send KRD the completed worksheet, web-path drawing, control-cabinet information and clear photos of the proposed sensor and actuator locations. KRD can then narrow the product family for a further engineering review.
Provide the web-path drawing, controlled zone, material, width and thickness, target tension range, full speed range, core and maximum roll diameter, existing brake, clutch or drive, available feedback and command signals, cabinet power, and measurable acceptance cases.
Possibly, but the controller, sensor range, actuator and tuning must cover every intended material and operating condition. If stored parameter sets are required, confirm that function on the exact controller model and validate each recipe on the machine.
No. Check the load-cell rating, mechanical geometry, output type, excitation or amplifier requirements, number of sensors and the controller's supported input range. Size the sensor with the chosen manufacturer's method.
It may be reusable only after its command type, voltage or current range, power stage, control direction, operating limits and fail-safe behaviour are matched to the new controller. A drive must also support the control mode required by the selected architecture.
Send the web-path drawing, material and tension data, roll sizes, line speed, existing actuator or drive, available feedback and I/O, plus the operating cases that must be verified. KRD can help narrow the controller, sensor and interface shortlist for engineering review.