Resources / Web Guide Actuator Retrofit Selection

How to Select a Web Guide Actuator for a Retrofit

A reliable actuator retrofit starts with the guide mechanism and required correction window, then matches stroke, thrust, response, feedback, mounting and controller interfaces to the real machine.

Industrial web guiding mechanism correcting a moving film web across guide rollers
Actuator retrofit selection

Specify the moving mechanism before choosing the actuator

Document the correction geometry, usable travel, mechanical load, response requirement and control interfaces before matching an actuator family.

1. Define what the actuator must move

Begin with the correction mechanism rather than an actuator model number. Nireco's guide-roll selection guidance treats web material, width, tension, required correction, speed and machine installation conditions as connected inputs, and distinguishes center-pivot from end-pivot arrangements.[1]

For a retrofit, record whether the actuator shifts an unwind or rewind stand, moves a guide frame, pivots a steering assembly, positions a sensor, or performs another defined motion. Include the moving mass, support arrangement, motion direction, available space and the process section that must receive the corrected web.

Mechanism

Identify the moving structure, pivot or slide arrangement, bearings, existing attachment points and direction of correction.

Web path

Document material, width range, tension range, line-speed range, entry and exit spans, wrap and the downstream reference that must remain aligned.

Retrofit boundary

Separate the parts being retained from the actuator, feedback, controller, wiring, mount and guarding that require engineering review.

2. Specify usable stroke and the neutral position

Nominal actuator stroke is not, by itself, a retrofit specification. RE's WG pivoting-frame technical table presents actuator stroke and speed together with roll length and maximum web tension across different guide sizes, showing that travel belongs to a mechanism-level selection rather than an isolated actuator label.[2]

  1. Measure the existing mechanism at its neutral position and at both permitted correction limits.
  2. Record the normal web-position error band separately from the maximum mechanical movement available.
  3. Identify hard stops, sensor range, cable movement, bearing travel and any structure that limits safe usable motion.
  4. Confirm how the retained or proposed controller establishes centre, home and travel limits for the selected feedback method.[5]

Do not add an arbitrary stroke allowance or assume the full catalogue stroke can be used on the machine. Final travel must be checked against the real geometry, permitted mechanism movement and controller configuration.

3. Match thrust, speed and response to the mechanism

Actuator data should be reviewed as a set, not as one headline value. BST's actuator brochure describes combinations of actuation path, force and speed, with or without position feedback, while KRD's PD series selection page organizes models by stroke, thrust, drive load and maximum drive speed.[3][4]

Thrust and load

Provide the mechanism load, orientation, friction condition and any changing process force so KRD can review the required actuator family and mounting arrangement.

Speed and response

Define the correction distance and operating condition that create the response requirement; line speed alone does not describe how fast the mechanism must move.

Repeatable positioning

Confirm whether the application needs position feedback, servo centre or a defined return position, and verify those functions across the controller-actuator combination.

The output is a matched operating point, not a claim that the actuator's maximum thrust, maximum speed and full stroke are simultaneously available or appropriate. Use the selected model's approved data and application review for the final combination.

4. Verify controller, feedback and commissioning interfaces

The actuator cannot be approved independently of its control interfaces. RE's SmartMotion documentation combines motor and control electronics, calculates and controls actuator stroke with its display, and lists power, sensor inputs, remote-control inputs and fieldbus interfaces; those functions are specific to that product family and illustrate the interfaces a retrofit review must verify.[5]

Erhardt+Leimer's DRS20 system data likewise places actuating travel and speed beside supply voltage, current, digital I/O and sensor measuring range. This supports reviewing mechanical travel, electrical interfaces and sensing as one matched system, without treating another manufacturer's values as KRD specifications.[6]

Treat manufacturer procedures as model-specific references, not universal commissioning instructions. The responsible machine team must verify the approved wiring, settings, limits, guarding and restart behaviour for the actual retrofit.

5. Prepare the data package for KRD review

KRD's PD series page asks for required thrust load, stroke, speed, mounting space and web width when requesting actuator sizing support. A useful retrofit package adds the machine drawing, guide-mechanism photos, existing component model numbers, control diagram, operating ranges and the quality issue that the correction must address.[4]

  1. Machine and web-path drawing with the correction point, web direction and critical downstream process marked.
  2. Material, web width and tension ranges, normal and maximum line speed, and observed lateral error.
  3. Mechanism mass or load information, movement orientation, available stroke, mounting dimensions and current actuator photographs.
  4. Existing controller, sensor, motor, feedback, power, wiring and PLC interface information.
  5. Required operating modes, acceptance checks and the responsible engineering owner for final machine approval.

KRD can use this package to review whether a PD linear actuator, PG guide mechanism, integrated EPC unit or another matched arrangement is the appropriate starting point. Final compatibility, sizing, installation and commissioning remain machine-specific.

Related KRD products and applications

Sources & References

  1. Nireco Corporation. Guide Roller Mechanisms (Hydraulic Type) Accessed 2026-07-29 Back
  2. RE S.p.A.. WG Web Guiding System Pivoting Frame Accessed 2026-07-29 Back
  3. BST Group. Actuators: High-Performance Position Control for Any Application Published 2020 | Accessed 2026-07-29 Back
  4. KRD Automation. PD Series Servo Linear Actuator Accessed 2026-07-29 Back
  5. RE S.p.A.. SmartMotion Web Guide Control Unit Accessed 2026-07-29 Back
  6. Erhardt+Leimer. ELGUIDER DRS20 Web Guiding System Accessed 2026-07-29 Back

FAQ

Can I select a web guide actuator from line speed alone?

No. Line speed is one input, but selection also needs the guide mechanism, moving load, usable travel, correction requirement, web conditions, mounting and controller interfaces.

Is a larger actuator stroke always safer for a retrofit?

No. The usable stroke must remain within the guide mechanism, sensor, cable, bearing and machine limits. KRD should review the measured neutral position and permitted travel before a model is selected.

What should I send KRD for actuator sizing?

Send the machine and web-path drawing, web and operating ranges, required correction, mechanism load and mounting dimensions, existing component details, control interfaces, photographs and acceptance requirements.

Can an existing controller be retained with a new actuator?

Possibly, but only after the motor, drive output, feedback, limits, polarity, power, connectors, wiring and operating modes are verified for the exact controller-actuator combination.

Request a web guide actuator retrofit review

Send the machine drawing, web path, operating ranges, correction requirement, mechanism load, mounting space and existing control details. KRD can help define a matched actuator and web-guiding configuration for engineering review.

Contact KRD Automation